A LITERARY CLUB FOR A NEW MILLENNIUM

By

Roger E. Ball

Delivered to

The 125th Anniversary Dinner of

The Chicago Literary Club

January 11, 1999

Copyright 1999 Roger E. Ball

The Chicago Literary Club has asked me to predict what the future may hold for the club. To do so one must ask first how the world itself will change. But to make such a prediction is an invitation to make a fool of oneself. Far brighter and better informed people than myself have made predictions about the future that have later turned out to be ludicrous. Here are a few examples from a vast collection:

In 1865 the Boston Post, in an editorial, had this to say: "Well informed people know it is impossible to transmit the voice over wires and if it were possible to do so, the thing would be of no practical value."

In 1895 Lord Kelvin, who played a major role in the development of thermodynamics and the electromagnetic theory of light said: "Heavier than air flying machines are impossible."

In 1908 Ernest Rutherford who won a Nobel prize for founding the science of radioactivity had this to say: "The idea of extracting energy from the nucleus of the atom is pure moonshine."

In 1957 Lee DeForest who invented the three-element vacuum tube and the self-regenerating circuit, thus making radio broadcasting possible, said this: "Man will never reach the moon regardless of all future scientific advances."

An interesting feature of these predictions is that they all refer to something that will not or cannot happen. The predictors fell into a logical trap. A development is only possible or impossible within the context of existing knowledge and the direction in which knowledge will develop is notoriously difficult to predict.
In the sections that follow I will discuss two scientific developments that are already well advanced, concentrating not so much on the technology itself but on how it will affect society. The effects are likely to be profound. I hope to demonstrate later that our club will need to consider how to react.

Neuroscience is now the hot area in scientific development. The Society for Neuroscience was founded in 1970 with 1100 members. It now totals over 26,000. Its latest convention in San Diego drew 23,052, making it one of the biggest professional conventions in the country. Students are abandoning areas like philosophy and psychology in droves to go into neuroscience. This is where the real action is.
Neuroscience is on the threshold of a theory whose impact will be as powerful and even more disturbing than Darwinism. Long-established concepts of the mind, the soul, and free will are being reexamined from a strictly scientific viewpoint. Much of philosophy, psychology, and psychoanalysis will need to be rewritten, and the impact on religion may be profound. This knowledge is now confined to a small group of researchers working at locations like the Laboratory of Neurophysiology at Harvard Medical School, but it is like a ticking time bomb. As it spreads out into the general public we can expect dismay, horror, and frequently denial.

Since long before Aristotle people have speculated about the brain but without any real data. Now for the first time we are able to observe the brain in operation. This has come about through the development of devices such as positive emission tomography, (PET Scans), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRS), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).
These devices were originally developed for medical diagnosis. Now, with the help of computers, they permit us to measure blood flow and biochemical changes in the brain as it deals with different problems, and in different states such wakefulness, sleep, and dreaming. For the first time, knowledge on how the brain works is based on solid scientific evidence rather than speculation.
The first casualty of this new knowledge is the venerable mind/brain problem, a persistent puzzle of philosophy for hundreds of years. This is the belief that the mind is something distinct from its mechanism --- a ghostly "self" somewhere inside the brain that interprets and directs its operation. Well, there is no such ghost. What we call the mind is simply the brain in operation. This shoots down dualism so we can scrap Descartes except for his mathematics. We can also scrap parts of Kant, Hume, and Locke. Along with them will go much of the mystical speculation about something that has been called "spirit"
Most disturbing of all is the problem of the soul. All of Judeo-Christian theology is based on the concept of an immortal soul, inhabiting the body but distinct from it, and equipped with free will and the knowledge of good and evil. If all of our thoughts, memories, and emotions are the result of electro-chemical patterns playing out on the neurons of our brains, as seems to be the case, where then is the soul? Can theology be rewritten without the soul but saving the ethical messages? Will anyone dare to do it?
Another casualty of the new neuroscience is strict determinism. It now appears that the way our brains operate is strongly influenced by the chemical balance between two classes of neurotransmitters --- the amine group and the choline group. This balance is mediated in part by random events taking place in the brain stem. There is also the possibility that, at its deepest level, the brain is a quantum device, subject to quantum randomness. If brain processes are largely random and unpredictable free will is still possible, but in an attenuated form. The loss of complete control may be an advantage since it can be the source of creativity and leaps of intuition. Random processes are an inexhaustible source of new information in the form of options and alternatives

How far are you willing to go with these ideas? You had better think hard because the evidence is very persuasive. It is disturbing because the issue this time around is not the evolution of our species but the nature of our own precious selves.
Very dear to our hearts is the idea of a self who exercises self-control, postpones gratification, curbs sexual appetite, stops short of aggression and criminal behavior, can lift itself by study, practice, perseverance and refusal to give up. Does the new brain science mean that we must give up these values along with the concept of an independent self? I think not, but the subject requires careful thought.
.
As this knowledge becomes available to the general public it seems certain to exacerbate the culture wars that are disturbing our social and political life. This struggle pits those of a tolerant and liberal persuasion against a sizable group that would like to reinstate a moral and political orthodoxy that they feel has been lost. Many of the latter group are religious fundamentalists who still refuse to accept evolution. Their reaction to the ideas of the neuro-scientists are likely to be extreme. However, these are good people, their concerns are genuine and deeply felt. They should be treated with sympathy and understanding.

I believe that these problems will create a good deal of discord but in the end will resolve themselves. After all, we have been down this road before. The Copernican revolution was startling and disturbing but it revealed a sky far more mysterious, interesting, and challenging than the tight little cosmos of Ptolemy. Darwin dislodged us from a fancied position of dominance over all other creatures. In return, we learned our true kinship and inter-dependence with the rest of life We became better people. Knowledge is always better than ignorance.

What has been called distributed intelligence is the second area of science that may have a profound impact on society. Until recently intelligence, or the ability to study information and reach rational conclusions, has been confined exclusively to humans and the higher animals. Now we have taught the machines to think, and do they ever do it! Washing machines sense the nature of the load and decide how to adjust the temperature and wash cycle. Thermostats can sense when a person enters a room and adjust the heating or cooling to that person's known habits and preferences. The computer at Amazon.com analyzes my prior purchases and decides what books or music would interest me. The computer that I have used to type these words makes many decisions without input from me, some of them against my wishes.

It is in the areas of work and education that distributed intelligence threatens (or promises) to change society, and it is here that we encounter a good deal of misinformation and misunderstanding.
We constantly hear that today's jobs require a higher level of education and skill than in the past. This is only partially true. Highly skilled workers are needed in fields such as computer programming, systems analysis, biotechnology and high-tech manufacturing. These jobs get most of the attention, but they are a small proportion of the total. Most people work at jobs like retail sales clerk, super-market checkout clerk, insurance claim reviewer, and garage attendant. All of these jobs require less skill and less education than in the past. Sales people no longer need know how to make change. Insurance adjusters can keyboard the data into their terminal and get an initial reading without any thought or judgment on their part. Garage mechanics can use a diagnostic machine that eliminates the need for a thorough understanding of engine performance. In each case the machine makes a decision that is almost always more reliable than that of the worker. And in each instance, the job of the worker has been downgraded and its value reduced, along with the worker's bargaining power.
Not so long ago the job of master mechanic in a metal fabricating plant was a well paid and highly respected one. The mechanic needed a thorough understanding of the complex geometry of gear teeth and screw threads, and how to produce them with lathes and milling machines, using a variety of steels and other metals. Now all this knowledge is contained in the digitally controlled machine tools. The job of master mechanic has been designed out of existence. The machines have taken over.
This process is inexorable and will affect jobs at higher and higher levels. So-called expert systems are being put in place to enable nurses to make diagnostic decisions formerly made by doctors. It is not enough to view this as a welcome reduction in the doctor's already heavy workload. What is does is reduce the skill requirement of the doctor's job. Part of his value to society has been designed away and turned over to the machine. This cannot fail to affect his compensation.

Two processes are at work. On the one hand there is the complete elimination of some jobs that can be done better by machines, such as the case of the master mechanic. On the other hand there is the downgrading of many jobs as the skill content is reduced. The two processes together will increase the already frightening polarity of incomes in our society. In the high-tech industries supply-and-demand forces will keep incomes high. But in a larger part of society workers prospects for a living wage are declining . The distinction between the haves and the have-nots will continue to increase.
What we see here is the breakdown of a system that in the past has served capitalist society very well. Economic growth produced jobs, the jobs required skills that gave the worker bargaining power, and the worker's income allowed him to purchase the products of industry. Now we have economic growth, it is producing jobs, but many of the jobs do not pay a living wage. Our leaders face this very serious problem with denial and the pursuit of trivial distractions. Creative imagination has never been so urgently needed.

Creativity is born out of imagination, which is difficult to define but not that difficult to display. Bear with me while I try to show an example of the imagination at work.

They have come to the shore, bringing the sheep down from the high summer pastures on the foothills of Mount Ossa. The season is late and there are already snowflakes in the air. As always, the descent was arduous, through rocky passes with the dogs nipping at the reluctant sheep. The men used their staves for balance on the steeper pitches. Now the sheep are safely penned in a rocky enclosure facing the sea, The men drink wine and feast on fatty mutton, roasted over the fire that they have made from driftwood. They are ready for the story.
The bard stands and strikes his lyre three times --- the classic Pythagorean cadence. He begins to speak. He is speaking in rhymed hexameters, his voice rising and falling, balanced by the caesura in the middle of each line. By his side, his assistant taps a small drum to emphasize the rhythm. The effect is hypnotic. Imagination carries the men's minds away to another shore, far distant in time and space.
On this shore black ships are drawn up on the beach, their masts and rigging securely lashed down. Fires burn along the beach, and there are guards and a few dogs patrolling the line of ships. A river runs into the sea on the Eastern boundary. Beyond the ships there is a cluster of tents. Beyond these, the plain stretches away to the North where there is a fortified city, enclosed by high walls. At intervals on these walls there are towers where watchmen search for intruders on the plain.
In a large tent just above the line of ships a meeting is taking place. The meeting has been called by Achilles, but it is Agamemnon, king of men, who is speaking. He is a commanding presence, impressively tall and with flashing eyes. He has organized these men, calling them from their scattered cities, and forming them into an army to rescue his brother's wife and avenge an unforgivable insult. He has even sacrificed his own daughter to appease the gods and gain favorable winds. Now he explains that the gods require him to give up the young woman that was allotted to him as his prize. In return, he will seize Briseis, the woman given as a prize to Achilles.
God-like Achilles leaps to his feet, raging. "Drunkard! With the face of a dog and the heart of a deer. ." he screams. His hand is on his sword. The other men stir and their hands go to their weapons. These are hot-blooded men, already hardened in battle. They have sworn fealty to Agamemnon but their hearts are with Achilles who is one of them and the best of all. Agamemnon has struck a deadly blow at his pride and honor..
Achilles is truly frightening . He is a man of violence, born and shaped for battle. Son of Peleus by the sea-goddess Thetis, he was raised by the centaur Chiron. He has openly and willingly renounced a life of ease in favor of a short life and a glorious one. He will be sung about by bards and idealized by generations of boys as the paragon of manly courage and the beau ideal of the perfect warrior. But he must resist to the absolute limit of his ability the insult to his honor that has just been proposed. He will burst through the ranks and kill Agamemnon.
White-armed Athena, urged on by Hera, descends from heaven in a column of blazing light. She seizes Achilles by the hair and persuades him to stay his hand. Since she is a goddess he must agree, but the quarrel is not over and many brave men will die before the will of Zeus is fulfilled.

This is what my imagination has done with the tools that Homer provides. Your imagination will see the details in a different way. This is what great literature does. It provides the mind with visions that can be elaborated, refined, rehearsed, retold, and re-imagined again and again. This is a private enterprise, a dialogue between you and the source..
But a third party has entered this dialogue and our imaginations are under attack. Movie producers and TV writers tell you that they know, and you don't, what Achilles looked like, how Captain Ahab braced himself against the mast as the Pequod plunged to its doom, how Napoleon's marshals clustered around him as they surveyed the plain of Borodino. They have coopted your imagination. .
This may not be serious for adults but it is deadly serious for children. When children get together one is certain to say, "Let's pretend." Left to themselves, they can use almost any collection of objects to create a world of the imagination. Now, they are more likely to sit in front of a TV screen and let the writers and producers set the scene. Their imaginations have been coopted.

The Chicago Literary Club stands firm in its defense of literature and the world of the imagination. During the next millennium the world will change but this club will continue to meet each Monday. A member will read a paper that has been carefully and lovingly prepared. Our interests and imagination will be stirred, and we will gather for conversation and discussion. .
As the Club moves into the new millennium it must avoid the danger that besets all venerable institutions - the tendency to become excessively conservative, hidebound, and set into long-established patterns of thinking and operation. I have a few suggestions to counter this trend. They are my personal wishes and will need to be debated and thought out by the membership. It is important that this debate start and be continued. Here are my suggestions:

We should consider doing more special events similar to the joint programs that we have been doing with the Fortnightly Club. One such possibility would be a program with the Cliff Dwellers. We share some of the interests of that club and their broader contact with the arts would help expand our own vision.

Along that same line we should consider broadening our programs. Literature has never existed alone but in the context of the other arts. During my term as President I made a start by introducing a musical interlude in connection with the reading of the regular paper. I believe that more efforts of this kind should be made.

I believe that many of the papers that are produced by our members merit publication to a wider audience. I suggest that we explore opportunities for publication in media such as the Chicago Tribune or Chicago Magazine.

We should make a determined effort to attract younger members. It is not true that young people are uniformly uninterested in literature and the arts.

I think we should encourage more papers dealing with current problems rather than biography and reminiscence. The problems discussed in this paper could well be the inspiration for a number of interesting papers.

We should seek more members from the Literature and Humanities departments of the major universities. In a club devoted to literature it is surprising that these professionals in the field make up such a small proportion of our membership.

The Chicago Literary Club is a jewel in the cultural life of the city. We move forward with confidence into the new millennium, and I feel honored to participate in this great adventure.

Return to PAPERS
Return to Main Menu