CHARLES L. HUTCHINSON AND HIS DESIGN
PROFESSIONALS
By John K. Notz, Jr.
Delivered to
The Chicago Literary Club (at The Cliff
Dwellers)
Monday, November 19, 2001
(1) John Olmsted (stepson and primary successor to the landscape design practice of the more famed Frederick Law Olmsted);_______________________________
(2) Charles Coolidge of the Boston architectural firm of Shepley, Rutan & Coolidge, successors to the architectural practice of Henry Hobson Richardson;
(3) Robert Spencer - today, a virtually unrecognized Prairie School architect, but a contemporary of Frank Lloyd Wright; Spencer was best known for his writings on what, many years later, was dubbed by Thomas Tallmadge as "The Prairie School".
[Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz, Culture and the City (University of Chicago Press, 1967, republished, 1989, but, again, out of print.)]Hutchinson was a "joiner", like no other "joiner" of whom I have read.
Hutchinson had no children. He had one brother (William, or "Willie"), but that brother never married and had no children. Hutchinson had two or three sisters; one (Kate) married the only son of a famed Chicago lawyer, Noble Brandon Judah. Judah's son, Noble, Jr., at the end of Hutchinson's life, was Hutchinson's personal lawyer; shortly prior to Mrs. Hutchinson's death, Judah, Jr., became one of the three Trustees responsible for the ongoing operation of "Wychwood".WYCHWOOD, the Charles L. Hutchinson estate on Geneva Lake's north shore, is shown on this postcard that was postmarked March 11, 1907, in Lake Geneva. The estate, built by the Hutchinsons in 1900, was named Wychwood by Mrs. Hutchinson in reference to the "Wych-hazel" that grew in many places on the grounds. The Hutchinsons developed many of the acres of woods into a wildlife sanctuary that attracted more than 60 species of birds. In 1932, the estate was given to the University of Chicago and used as an experimental and research station for students, although it was maintained as a refuge for native plants and birds. William Wrigley acquired it in the 1950s and extensively remodeled it. The old postcard is from the extensive collection belonging to John E. Brayton, of Des Plaines, Illinois, and Lake Geneva.
"Nearer [our Chicago] home [than "The Dells" and Devil's Lake, WI] is a land of pure delight to the hiker, namely Lake Geneva, Wisconsin, and the knob and kettle hole country to the North and Northeast. It is ideal land for our requirements, made to order, seemingly, for it offers an easy stroll for Saturday afternoon along the path that leads through the wonderful estates that border the famous lake. Such a stroll is a 'curtain raiser' for the real walk on Sunday. On a few of our trips, we spent both Saturday afternoon and Sunday on Lake Geneva, making the entire circuit of about 25 miles. Of all the estates along the lake, none is lovelier than "Wychwood", the home of the late Charles L. Hutchinson, art connoisseur and well- known financier and, for a long time, President of The Chicago Art Institute. Here, we were guests, many times, visiting the home harmonious, so perfectly fitting its notable setting, meeting Mr. Hutchinson, and strolling along the winding trail through the magic forest where all its native beauty and wildness has been preserved and heightened by wise and loving care." (italics supplied)Hutchinson and his wife had seen to the construction of "Wychwood" in 1901-1902; it was, justly, famed for its horticulture [LeMoyne, Jenkins, Griswold, to name a few authors of high praise]. Upon Mrs. Hutchinson's death in the 1930's, The University of Chicago took over the remainder interest after Mrs. Hutchinson's life estate in "Wychwood", with an endowment provided by her. However, the University, in severe financial straits in and after the 1930's, ceased to maintain "Wychwood" in the style to which the Hutchinsons had been accustomed and her endowment had been designed to continue. As soon as a 25-year trust restriction on transfer provided for by the Hutchinsons, permitted, the University sold "Wychwood" to an individual who lopped off the upper two stories of the original residence and roofed the remaining story. My own contemporary, Bill Wrigley, demolished the balance; Bill, once, told me that the condition of the foundation did not warrant even its use for the footprint of the new house that he built on the site.Source: "Outdoors With The Prairie Club", written by Members of the Club and compiled by Emma Doeserich, Mary Sherburne and Anna B. Wey (Paquin Publishers, Chicago, 1940, at p. 159)]
". . . [A]fter numerous near and far connections had been safely furnished with homes of their own, institutions of various kinds utilized the architectural tastes of The Constant Improver to their great advantage."The thesis of my paper, tonight, is that a remarkable number of Hutchinson's business and social friends turned to him to select their design professionals, not only in connection with their joint civic endeavors but even with respect to their own personal homes.[Source: The chapter titled "Our Country Life", circa 1912, in "Wychwood - The History of an Idea", at p. 265 (1928)]
. . . [Frederick Law] Olmsted's stepson and son, John C. Olmsted and Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., . . . continued the Olmsted firm for 25 years after their father retired in 1895. It was the largest landscape architecture business in the country. John C., not only headed it, he was also active in organizations that promoted the profession; as first President of the American Society of Landscape Architects, he had much to say about early standards of practice and membership. . . ."My own research in the Archives of The Library of Congress into the extensive documentation maintained there of the operations of the Olmsted Firm has led me conclude that, while John could be deemed to have been obsessive in his assiduous preparation of site reports (handwritten, I think, and later transcribed) that he sent back to his Firm's Home Office in Brookline, MA, they are a treasure trove of evidence - sometimes gossip - of his dealings with his Firm's clients and their representatives. While John Olmsted appears to have induced "Rick" to use the same practice of written reports to the Firm's Home Office, those of Rick's that I have reviewed in another connection do not contain the detail (or the gossip) that those of John contain.
[Note: My recent review of Mrs. Hutchinson's books has led me to believe that the extant structure used as a Gardener's Lodge was, instead, a mirror image of the original Gardner's Lodge - the original - since vanished - having been constructed immediately across the entrance drive.)I was, first, led to this speculation by the following sentences in Spencer's biographical entries:
". . . While practicing in Chicago, [Spencer] . . . was particularly well known for his designs for country homes, including those for Charles L. Hutchinson and Harlow N. Higinbotham. . . ."; andThe first quotation was likely to have been supplied by Spencer's family, long after the event; the second was composed by Spencer, himself.
". . . [In 1891,] Mr. Spencer returned to Shepley, Rutan & Coolidge, re-entering their Chicago office to take direct charge of the interior design and decoration of The Chicago Public Library, many of the rich details of marble, mosaic and plaster in this building being from his hand. Since 1895, Mr. Spencer has actively practiced his profession in Chicago, where he has gained a national reputation as a designer of charming country houses, examples of his work being found in the estates of such well-known Chicagoans as Charles L. Hutchinson [on Geneva Lake, WI], Harlow N. Higinbotham [near Joliet, IL], Charles A. Stevens [on Delavan Lake, WI] and E. A. Hamill [in Lake Forest, IL]. . . ." (emphasis supplied)[Sources: National Cyclopedia of American Biography - 1958 volume and Historical Review of Chicago and Cook County; and Selected Biography, published by The Lewis Publishing Company of Chicago and New York in 1908, A. N. Waterman, A.B., LL.D., Editor]
"Some days ago I wrote my friend C. A. Coolidge to ask you to go with him to Littleton, N. H. to look at my farm. He is to make plans for some alterations in the buildings, and I very much wish your advice about what should be done to improve and beautify the place without interfering too much with nature. Mr. Coolidge writes that he has seen you, and that you and he will go about August 20th. . . ." (emphasis supplied)Because of its several typos in the address of a later letter by Coolidge to the Olmsted Firm, I read this letter as a first introduction of Coolidge to Mr. Olmsted, Sr., but an introduction that led to no immediate relationship of consequence.
[Source: March, 1895, letter from Coolidge to the Olmsted Firm, addressed with Olmsted misspelled twice and Eliot misspelled once - to Olmstead, with an "a", Olmstead, with that "a", & Elliott (with two "l"s and two t"s.]This letter is among the earliest of the 1895 correspondence relating to a decision by the Trustees of The Art Institute of Chicago (led by Charles Hutchinson) to use the services of the Olmsted Firm in connection with the landscape surrounding the then first structure (extant) of The Art Institute of Chicago, the architect of which was Shepley, Rutan & Coolidge, with Charles Coolidge, lead partner for the project. The tenor of the language used between Coolidge and John Olmsted was that of peers; by then, Coolidge had his contract for the structure; and Olmsted had his contract for the design of its surrounding landscape.
". . . [Mr. Hamill] also told me that he was puzzled in his choice of an architect by the fact that three excellent architects, who were also intimate friends, lived in Lake Forest. This included Frost, of Frost & Granger and [Howard Van Doren] Shaw and one other. He also liked Charlie Coolidge. He said that he would be guided largely by the advice of Mr. Hutchinson, who was his mentor in matters of taste." (emphasis supplied)"Mentor in matters of taste" - that phrase was the Genesis of this paper. Robert Spencer had designed Hamill's home, which came to be known as "Ballyatwood".[Source: Archives of Olmsted Associates in The Library of Congress, to which my attention was invited by Arthur Miller of the Library of Lake Forest College.]
[Ernest Hamill's "Ballyatwood" must be distinguished from the residence of Hamill's son, Alfred Hamill - "The Centaurs" - designed by David Adler.]While Spencer's "Ballyatwood" has survived, it has been substantially altered, so that Spencer's original design cannot be recognized. However, what has survived, in a pristine state, is the Spencer-designed Gatehouse for "Ballyatwood".
[The Gatehouse is, now occupied by David Bahlman, Executive Director of The Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois.]It is a Prairie Style residence, some of whose details bring to mind the Gatehouse for Hutchinson's "Wychwood".
"Among the ugly circumstances in connection with your place are the two large steam yacht houses. That of your neighbor is less objectionable than your own in appearance but both are objectionable. We should strongly recommend you persuade your neighbor to remove his boathouse to the vicinity of the village of Lake Geneva where, in fact, all the boathouses which now disfigure the lake should be concentrated. We can see no very particular advantage in having these boat houses on each place and if the present custom continues the beauty of the lake will be much more injured than it is now, so that it would be worth a great effort to start the custom of storing the steam launches all at the same place. . . ." (emphasis supplied)Mrs. Hutchinson's version of these events is this:
"Most people, when building a pier on their shore line, expect the pier to remain on that spot to the end of time - I mean their time. Imagine my amazement, then, when, one day, I caught a remark about 'moving the pier'. If the Constant Improver had, casually, said that he thought of moving the house, I could not have been more surprised."In short, in 1910, Hutchinson persuaded Bartlett, Chapin and Harris - to consolidate their boathouses into one common-walled structure. Some years later, having obtained a general contractor's copy of the three extant, boathouses, Swift added his. Neither Hutchinson nor a sixth neighbor [Glennon] ever added the boathouse to which he was entitled. I speculate that, since Hutchinson had the use, on call, of Ryerson's steam yacht, he never bothered to see to the construction of a boathouse for himself. The sixth participant died before doing anything in this regard.
". . . 'But, where will you put it? . . . We must have one, you know.' For I am, always, dreading the moment when the Constant Improver's strong sense of the beautiful will overcome his practical ideas."
"'I think that it will go on the other side of the island and entirely be out of the way.'"
"As usual, he was right. . . . In the Spring, when the pier was put out, we found it a much more attractive spot at which to anchor, . . . Where the pier formerly stood, a long seat now commands a lovely view of rippling water and dented shore.
". . . [O]ne year, there seemed to be nothing especial on hand, and I detected a brooding gaze on the plenty-good enough garage, and overheard sentences beginning, 'If I were to build again' - which were ominous signs. Luckily, at this moment, the subject of boathouses came up. Now, we had no boat; and, if we had, the Constant Improver [Mr. Hutchinson] did not approve of boathouses, as they disfigured the shore. But our neighbors who had boats did approve of them, and there was a good deal of discussion as to size, location, etc. Whereat the Master Mind [Mr. Hutchinson, again] became interested and, finally, said, 'If you three men [Harris, Swift and Bartlett] are going to build three boathouses on the shore, do let me think it over and submit a plan."
"Nothing loath. They consented. Now was the Laird of the Manor [Mr. Hutchinson, again] happy, again; with paper, pad and ruler, he made mysterious measurements, he telephoned for necessary dimensions, he paced off bits of forest, he hung papers on long strings, and [he] went out in a rowboat to judge the effect. He even deigned to consult the Friendly Architect [Spencer?] about possible weights and measures. Very busy, indeed, were all his spare moments, now, and very inscrutable his countenance. At last, his plan was ready, and he called his neighbors together, for consultation."
"'You know that low piece of ground next to me in the thick woods?' he began. 'Well, that can be bought [from me], and you can put your three boathouses there, in one building. Each man will own the lot under his house; there will be no connection between them; and, yet, the general effect will be of one admirable building.'" . . .
"Placed sixty feet back from the shore, . . . the wide trellised structure of smooth cement blocks presented anything but a conventional appearance. A broad wooden band disguised the necessary slope of the roof, the beautifully proportioned brown trellis concealed the awkward doors and divided the length into agreeable panels; and the cement blocks, put up with heavy mortar, made so pleasing a surface that the first idea of lines was abandoned. . . . With bushes planted thickly in front of this structure, with trees bending over it, no one can say that it disfigures the shore line. Indeed, it seems to nestle down into the landscape and become part of the forest. . . ."
[Source: The chapter titled "Our Country Life, circa 1912", in "Wychwood - The History of an Idea", at pp. 261-266 (1928)]
". . . A landscape architect shall be jointly engaged to lay out the grounds for driveways, walks and water views, at our joint expense, pro rata according to the cost of the land purchased, and, in case of any difference of opinion between us, the landscape architect employed as above named shall decide, his opinion to be final among us; . . ."In the early stages of development of their homes, Harris and Swift had no difficulties with each other. The Geneva Lake houses that Coolidge designed for Hutchinson and Harris were distinctive, with Hutchinson's a Shingle Style on the low end, and Harris vying for a grandiosity award. Swift used Howard Van Doren Shaw as the architect for his "Villa Hortensia" [named for Swift's wife]. The houses for Harris and Swift exist, today, in good condition.
[The Harris property is, often, opened by Richard Driehaus, the present owner, for events for Chicago and Geneva Lake area charities.]I am told by a knowledgeable friend that, in a difficult economic time - probably The Financial Panic of 1907, Swift approached Harris for a loan. The request was not granted. The relationship between the two men cooled, and John Olmsted has to have earned his decision- maker's fee, negotiating the siting of each house, with Swift and Shaw on one hand and Harris and Coolidge on the other, so that its views would not be obstructed by the placement of the other's.
[The spite fence that is now between the Harris and Swift properties is a quite modern insert; that there was none in Harris' and Swift's time is to the credit of John Olmsted.]Simeon B. Chapin: The joint agreement between Harris and Swift went on to provide:
". . . [I]t [is] mutually desired to lay out about the north one half of said lots into a joint park with Mr. Hutchinson and Mr. Chapin, with a winding driveway running about east and west across and connecting the different estates . . . and at the same time as many drives and walks therein as can be obtained with good landscape effects."Simeon B. Chapin was the next neighbor to the West of Harris. Olmsted used good efforts to obtain the agreement of Hutchinson, Harris, Swift and Chapin to the joint driving park contemplated by Hutchinson, but he was not successful. The difficulties between Harris and Swift just described were not the only obstacle. In 1904, Hutchinson suggested to Chapin that he (Chapin) use Olmsted to suggest landscape design changes for Chapin's property that would cause its lake frontage visual effects to be integrated with those of Harris, Swift and Hutchinson. Olmsted walked the property with Chapin, probably commenting, as he went, and he wrote his customary detailed letter to the client and Memorandum to the Home Office file. Chapin paid the fee therefor, but he did nothing that Olmsted suggested. There is a testiness in Olmsted's Home Office Memorandum that is not present in any of the several dozen other such Memoranda that I have read in the Olmsted Brothers' Archive in The Library of Congress. I read between the lines that, because Olmsted urged that Chapin redo everything that Chapin, himself, had done, these good men got off on the wrong foot.
: "[I] went with [Mr. Hutchinson] to Lake Geneva. He said Mr. Bartlett was away and he (Mr. Hutchinson) is going to Italy Saturday, and today [he] was the only one [who] could talk over house site, etc., as Mr. Bartlett's representative, so we could go on with our plans. . . ." [emphasis supplied]And from a letter from John Olmsted to Frederick Bartlett (the son):
"We are glad to hear from you, as it seemed rather odd to have been employed by Mr. Hutchinson to visit the place and not to have had any communication whatever with the owner." [emphasis supplied]While some of the poor communication was a result of serious illness of Mr. Bartlett, in time he recovered, to enjoy his house and landscape, with the creation of which he had had little to do, other than see to payment.
"[Mr. Hutchinson] said as to Yerkes Observatory at Lake Geneva, he felt the open ground immediately about the building ought to be improved and that if it did not cost too much, he and Mr. Ryerson would employ us to plan and advise as to these improvements so he could transfer his surplus shrubs there. . . ."Only some of that design was executed, and what was executed has not been maintained other than by removal of trees that died (many of which were elms that attracted Dutch elm disease. There is occasion talk of its restoration, but I suspect that the greater risk is the University's abandonment of Yerkes Observatory, just as it abandoned "Wychwood".
". . . The architect is Henry Lord Gay. The house is large and fireproof, and the interior finish is hardwood. Such a house might easily cost $300,000, possibly $400,000. [Multiply by 20, to approximate in today's dollars - $6,000,000 - $8,000,000.] Mr. Young, however, seems very averse to any similarly expensive work on the grounds and will agree to no drives or courtyards or terraces or formal gardens that involve cutting trees and even heavy grading. Also, he wants to design the grounds, himself, by way of amusement." (emphasis supplied)Needless to say, there was no further involvement of the Olmsted Firm in Mr. Young's affairs. I have no reason to believe that Hutchinson had anything to do with Young's consideration of the Olmsted Firm.
[Curiously, in Robert Grese's 1992 list of Jens Jensen projects, there is one for Otto Young - the evidence thereof is too skimpy to make any surmises as to what Jensen may have done for Young, other than nothing.]Edward Ayer: Another early Geneva Lake project for John Olmsted was that in 1901 for Edward Ayer. In this one, Charles Hutchinson had a hand; this is from another John Olmsted Memorandum to the Home Office:
"Arrived about 4:00 PM in Mr. Ryerson's steam launch. . . . Mr. Ayer said he was very fond of boulders and has saved a lot of them - big ones - when clearing his pastures and fields back of the public road. He had contemplated using them in the vicinity of the mouth of the brook. I said that he could do so very properly if they were not piled regularly like cannon balls. . . ."There is irony in that last sentence, because, according to the lore of the adjacent Harvard Camp (which has, just celebrated its own Centennial), Mr. Ayer had created it as a place for his personal friends from Harvard to come to Geneva Lake and stay. Probably, this had been Mr. Ayer's goal, because Ayer's father had been the founder of Harvard, IL, the "milk cow town" just to the South of the West End of Geneva Lake. Overall, Ayer did little, in response to Olmsted's recommendations. However, in Ayer's case, I doubt that Ayer was a Chapin or a Young. I suspect that Mrs. Ayer's taste for "exotica" overcame Mr. Ayer's taste for the "naturalistic", and the Ayers, essentially, went their own way.
"Walked about the home grounds with Mrs. Ayer and learned her views and advised her as to numerous planting questions. She does not care for boulders but likes brilliant floral displays and all sorts of striking and interesting features. She prefers to cut down the native trees and plant exotic ones, and Mr. Ayer prefers the native trees, because they harmonize with the surroundings better. I agreed with him and advised a few foreign trees that have been planted in the hollow be cut out. . . . As they want a good screen along the west boundary to hide the numerous cheap cottages of Harvard Camp, . . ."
[Linn's son Howard married Lucy McCormick Blair, and the two of them cut a considerable swatch in Chicago's civic, charitable and social affairs; they are not, however, mentioned in connection with the properties of prominent Chicagoans on Geneva Lake.]Frederick W. Countiss: Countiss was a partner of Chapin; there is a 1912 Harris letter to John Olmsted, suggesting that Olmsted contact Countiss; nothing appears to come of that reference; one cannot, in this case, give credit, directly, to Hutchinson for this prospect.
[In one instance, Hutchinson's enthusiasm for Coolidge could have cost The University of Chicago the building that Annie McClure Hitchcock wished to give to the University in memory of her husband. Mrs. Hitchcock indicated her willingness in 1899; probably without realizing that Mrs. Hitchcock had funded Dwight Perkins' years at MIT, Hutchinson asked Coolidge to prepare sketches for it. Mrs. Hitchcock advised the Trustees of the University that her gift was conditioned on Perkins doing the architectural work on it. Perkins advised the Trustees that he would be willing to work with Coolidge on its design; Coolidge declined; thus, the University has its Hitchcock Hall.]In closing, I reflected a bit on the differences between the clientele around Geneva Lake of the clientele of John Olmsted and of Jens Jensen. We do know that John Olmsted knew Jensen. The following is from a 1906 Olmsted Memorandum to his Home Office:
"Arrived at Lake Geneva by train due 10:10 AM. Met Warren H. Manning going to [Henry H.] Porter's [Maple Lawn]) and [Jens] Jensen [going to J. B. Grommes' Allview] and came with them in train. . . ."While Jensen had substantial projects scattered about Geneva Lake (and on Delavan Lake), John Olmsted's only substantial projects around Geneva Lake were those for Hutchinson, Harris, Swift, Bartlett and the Yerkes Observatory; all but the Yerkes Observatory are subdivisions by Hutchinson of his own property; they are in a string on the North Shore of Geneva Lake. Yerkes Observatory could be deemed an extension of John Olmsted's design work for The University of Chicago. Hutchinson effected little with Ayer and Ryerson, and he effected nothing with Young, Chapin or Linn. In each of the five projects of substance, I suggest that none would have come to John Olmsted, were it not for Charles Hutchinson. In two of his three near misses (Chapin, Ayer and, probably, Linn), the catalyst, had any of these projects come to fruition, would have been Hutchinson. Elsewhere than around Geneva Lake, Hutchinson was the catalyst for Hamill, and he is likely to have been the catalyst for Higinbotham.
"Have arranged for you to give your lecture on landscape gardening in the Middle West at Lake Geneva on Saturday evening next. I will meet you at Lake Geneva upon arrival of the 3:40 train from Chicago. Get off at the Lake Geneva station. C L Hutchinson"One purpose of Hutchinson's invitation to Miller was Mrs. Hutchinson's publication in 1907 of her first book on their Geneva Lake home "Our Country Home". Another purpose could have been the formal opening of Lake Geneva's Horticultural Hall. Later, Miller provided Mrs. Hutchinson an exceedingly friendly comment on "Wychwood" for one of her books on it. [Frances Kinsley Hutchinson, "Wychwood" (The Lakeside Press, Chicago, 1928)] For my purposes, tonight, however, I imagine Hutchinson having said to his friends:
"John Olmsted is the only landscape designer that you should use; if you wish an East Coast architectural firm for your country house that will cost you 'top dollar', you should use Charles Coolidge of Shepley, Rutan & Coolidge; if you do not want to spend 'top dollar", and you want someone on the cutting edge of new design ideas, use Robert Spencer of Chicago."
"HUTCHINSON, Charles L., banker; born in Lynn, MA, on March 7, 1854; son of Benjamin P. and Sarah Ingalls Hutchinson; has lived in Chicago since 1856; graduated from Chicago High School in 1873; (Honorary A.M. degree from Tufts College in 1901); married Frances, daughter of Herbert M. Kinsley, in 11881. Became a grain merchant and, later, a banker; Vice President, Corn Exchange National Bank(formerly its President); Director of The Northern Trust Company. Has been President of The Chicago Board of Trade; was a Director and the Chairman, Fine Arts Committee of The World's Columbian Exposition; President, The Art Institute of Chicago for more than 25 years; President of The Chicago Orphan Asylum; President, General Conventions of The Universalist Church for four terms; Vice President, The Egyptian Exploration Fund; Treasurer, The University of Chicago; Trustee, The Carnegie Institution; Treasurer, The Auditorium Association; Director, The Presbyterian Hospital; Honorary Member, The American Institute of Architects; Member, Municipal Art League (Treasurer); President, American Federation of the Arts. Treasurer, Sanitary District of Chicago; Member, South Park Commission of Chicago. Clubs: Chicago, Union League, Chicago Athletic, University, Cliff Dwellers, Quadrangle, Commercial, Caxton, Literary. Residence: 2709 Prairie Avenue. Office: Corn Exchange National Bank.
"COOLIDGE, Charles Allerton, architect, was born on Boston, MA, November 30, 1858, . . . [F]ollowing his graduation [from Harvard University], [he] took a special course in architecture from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He spent a year in the office of Ware & Van Brunt and two years with H. H. Richardson, of Brookline, MA. In 1886, the firm of Shepley, Rutan & Coolidge was organized to carry on the work left unfinished at Mr. Richardson's death. His partners were George F. Shepley and Charles H. Rutan, and the firm was in existence until 1915. In that year, the firm of Coolidge & Shattuck was formed with George C. Shattuck, and, since 1924, Mr. Coolidge has been a member of the firm of Coolidge, Shepley, Bulfinch & Abbott. Mr. Coolidge has not been limited in his designs to any one type of building. Examples of his work are scattered all over the United States, include buildings for . . . the medical school, Tower group and Harper Memorial Library of The University of Chicago, and the Public Library, Art Institute, Corn Exchange Bank and Harris Trust building in Chicago; . . . In 1899, Mr. Coolidge was appointed American architect of the U. S. commission to the Paris exposition, and, for seven years, he served as Park Commissioner of the City of Boston. . . . He is a member of . . . Chicago Club of Chicago; . . . In politics, he is a Republican; and in religion, an Episcopalian, holding the office of Vestryman in Trinity Church, Boston. . . . He was married in St. Louis, MO, October 30, 1889, to Julia, daughter of John Rutledge Shepley of St. Louis, and they had four children: . . ."Excerpt from the 1907 edition of Marquis' The Book of Chicagoans, the first edition of what became "Who's Who of Chicago":
SPENCER, Robert Closson, Jr., architect; born in Milwaukee, WI, on April 13, 1864; son of Robert and Ellen (Whiton) Spencer; educated in the public and high schools of Milwaukee; graduated in mechanical engineering at The University of Wisconsin; 8th holder of the Rotch traveling scholarship in architecture (of Boston) in 1891-1893; married in Bath, MN, in 1889 to Ernestine Elliott; children: Marian L., Ernestine M., Charles E. Identified with architectural work in Boston until 1895, when he came to Chicago and, since that time, has practiced architecture in Chicago. Member of The Chicago Architectural Club, Sigma Chi fraternity. Independent in politics. Club: City. Recreations: tennis and hunting. Office: Steinway Hall. Residence: Keystone Avenue, River Forest, IL.
OLMSTED, JOHN CHARLES
(1852-1920)
landscape architect, planner
The early life of John Charles Olmsted was filled with extraordinary and traumatic events that were important in forming his shy personality and his broad-ranging interests. He was born in Vandeuvre, near Geneva, Switzerland, the son of John Hull Olmsted and Mary Cleveland Perkins Olmsted. By the time he was five, John Charles had transversed the Atlantic twice, lost his father to tuberculosis, gained a stepfather in 1859 (his uncle, Frederick Law Olmsted), and settled down to a more orderly life, in a house in the middle of Central Park, then under construction. The cozy stability of this situation was soon interrupted, first by the Civil War, when his stepfather transferred his new family to Washington, DC, in 1862, and, then, by a move to the Mariposa Estate, a frontier gold- mining operation in the foothills of California's Sierra Nevada, which the senior Olmsted managed from 1863 to 1865. Education amid the scenic splendors of Yosemite and the giant sequoias taught John Charles to read the landscape by its flora and fauna, its fossils and minerals. These lessons were reinforced in the Summers of 1869 and 1871, when he returned to the frontier, this time as a member of Clarence King's survey party in Nevada and Utah along the 40th parallel. Here, under often dangerous conditions, he developed his visual memory, to record with speed the topographical, geological and botanical clues of the land, skills that proved invaluable in his later work.
Following his graduation from Yale's Sheffield Scientific School, Olmsted began his professional career as an apprentice in his stepfather's New York office. Early projects included work on the U.S. Capitol grounds and several park and institutional projects. Travel to Europe in 1877- 1878, with concentrated architectural study in London, broadened his vision and further refined his skills. By 1884, with the move of the firm to Brookline, MA< John Charles had become a full partner with his stepfather. The firm, soon, grew to include Henry S. Codman and Charles Eliot, as co- partners. After Frederick Law Olmsted's retirement and the deaths of Codman and Eliot, John Charles and his younger half-brother, Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr., formed Olmsted Brothers in 1898. John Charles was senior partner until his own death in 1920; the firm continued until 1950.
In addition to his extensive design and planning work, John Charles took responsibility for developing productive office and training procedures, to manage a growing staff and diverse national practice. As one of the trainees, later a friend and collaborator, Arthur Shurcliff, recalled, Olmsted was "a man of few words, fond of detail, . . . [with] a broad grasp of large scale landscape planning" who "carried to completion a vast amount of work, quietly, with remarkable efficiency." Other apprentices, later colleagues, praised his teaching and thoughtful advice; the admired his ability to resolve complex design problems with artistry and practicality, while enhancing and protecting the natural features of a site. Like his stepfather, Olmsted was committed to the development of landscape art, as a profession, and to the education of communities and clients about the long-term benefits to be gained from careful, comprehensive planning. To this end, he was generous with his time and skills to organizations that sought to extend the influence of sound landscape planning, to beautify burgeoning cities. He was a founding member of the American Society of Landscape Architects, serving as its first president, and establishing the standards of membership, while being active in other groups such as the American Park & Outdoor Art Association (later, the American Civic Association) and the Association of Park Superintendents, which brought together various professional and civic leaders.
Although Olmsted's published writings are few, his extensive personal correspondence and reports reveal his comprehensive philosophy of design, innovative, yet pragmatic; reflective of the aesthetic tenets of his stepfather, yet responsive to the new social, economic and political demands of 20th century cities. His advice to clients, whether for public, private or institutional projects, was to plan for the future, to acquire as much land as possible, to enable a comprehensive design, protecting scenery and, yet, fulfilling the functional requirements. This advice was critical for municipalities for whom the firm was designing city-shaping park and parkway systems. As Olmsted noted, "The liberal provision of parks in a city is one of the surest manifestations of the . . . degree of civilization and the progressiveness of its citizens. As in the case of almost every complex work composed of varied units, economy, efficiency, symmetry and completeness are likely to be secured when the system, as a whole, is planned comprehensively and the purposes to be accomplished defined, clearly, in advance." Olmsted continued the park planning begun by his stepfather for Boston, Buffalo, Detroit, Rochester, Atlanta, Hartford, Louisville, Brooklyn, Chicago and other cities. He developed park systems for municipalities in diverse locations, including Portland, ME, and Portland, OR, Seattle and Spokane, Dayton and Charleston, and countrywide parks and parkways for Essex County, NJ. In New Orleans and Watertown, NY, he designed individual parks of great originality, on difficult sites. For the small parks in Chicago's densely populated industrial South Side, he turned derelict land parcels into an imaginative and efficient network of playgrounds, to serve immigrant families.
Park design in cities led to commissions for numerous institutions and subdivisions, often including individual residential work, large and small. Much of the fabric and amenity of cities such as Louisville, Dayton, Seattle and Northwest Washington, DC, results from the extensive planning for residential areas which Olmsted originated, with its associated roads, green spaces, schools and business areas. Comprehensive planning for communities around industrial plants, such as in Depew, NY, and Vandegrift, PA, or around the National Cash Register factory in Dayton, created attractive neighborhoods, instead of bleak tenements. Olmsted's abiding architectural interest was reflected in his residential work, where he took special care to accommodate building to site and vistas, often making preliminary house designs and collaborating, closely, with the residential architect. Likewise, plans for many park structures, particularly in the Boston system, originated with his sketches. Working cooperatively with architects was a major component of his institutional planning for school campuses, sanatoriums, state capitols and civic buildings across the country. His landscape layout provided a remarkably perceptive guide for future building development, retaining some degree of natural beauty in the site. Exposition planning, beginning with his work for the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, and continuing with the 1906 Lewis and Clark Exposition in Portland, OR, and the 1909 Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, which shaped The University of Washington Campus in Seattle, continued his architectural collaboration. He terminated the firm's work for the San Diego Exposition of 1915, when he felt that the architectural and business plans violated the landscape integrity of Balboa Park.
For over 40 years, John Charles Olmsted was a respected leader in the landscape and early planning professions, leaving a profound mark on the land, often unrecognized today. The firm's clientele grew to more than 3,500 commissions by the time of his death, many of which he had originated. An indefatigable worker, he was slowed in his last years of practice by the cancer that, eventually, took his life. In his remarkable career, Olmsted bridged the centuries from the vanishing frontier to the 20th century urban realities, leaving a lasting legacy of public and private designs across the country which melded a picturesque aesthetic with pragmatic planning. [The three sources cited relate only to substantial public, not to private, commissions.]